Safer Saws- bj112295

 

Personal Injury Lawyers –

6A: “Every year, there are over 40,000 table saw injuries, resulting in more than 4,000 amputations. Table saws cause more injuries than any other woodworking tool. Although SawStop safety technology has been around for more than ten years, not all table saw manufacturers have adopted it. In fact, the world’s largest tool manufacturers rejected it.”

6B: A lot of claims have been stated in this paragraph

-“Every year, there are over 40,000 table saw injuries…”

– “resulting in more than 4,000 amputations.”

-“Table saws cause more injuries than any other woodworking tool.”

-“not all table saw manufacturers have adopted it.”

-“the worlds largest tool manufacturers rejected it.”

6C:

-The kind of claim used in the first 2 statements are casual, there are 40,000 table saw injuries every year, it resulted in more than 4,000 amputations, this statement can spark controversy unto why we need Saw Stop.

-In the other claims written in this paragraph they could be categorized as factual because all of them exert factual statements that pursue unto why we need Saw Stop to be taken more serious as a company and a product.

6D: In this paragraph the issue for why we need Safe Stop is clearly stated. There are the facts more injuries occur from table saws than they do with woodworking tools and a lot of table saw manufacturers have yet to want to cope with the concept of being safe in the workshop. This point is so on point because it is a well deserved and needed fact.

6E: The first sentence it explains that 40,000 table saw injuries resulting in more than 4,000 amputations, yet it does not tell unto why the people were sent to the emergency room, was it because of Table Saw Injuries, or other reasons? The article also speaks on how Saw Stop was turned down by one of the worlds largest manufacturer companies. No one tells why it was rejected, was it because they needed to better the machine? Were there injuries that happened with the first model and caused a reasoning for rejection? Was it too much money for just an idea? There is no specific point on the why of they fact and are more going around what really needs to be explained with this fact.

 

This entry was posted in bj112295, E07: Safer Saws Claims. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s